GreenCalculusGet a free key
  1. Home
  2. Converters
  3. Carbon & CO₂e Mass
  4. Convert GtC to Gt CO₂ (Carbon Budget)
Last reviewed August 2026

Convert GtC to Gt CO₂ (Carbon Budget)

GtC
— Gt CO₂
Helpful?

GtC to Gt CO₂: common values
GtCGt CO₂
0.51.832
13.664
1.55.496
27.328
310.99
518.32
1036.64
2073.28
50183.2
100366.4

Each row uses the same factor as the converter above: 1 GtC = 3.664 Gt CO₂.

Climate science counts carbon two ways, and mixing them up throws every figure off by a factor of nearly four. A gigatonne of carbon (GtC) weighs only the carbon atoms; a gigatonne of carbon dioxide (Gt CO₂) weighs the whole molecule, carbon plus two oxygens. So 1 GtC = 3.664 Gt CO₂. This converter applies that ratio both ways — essential for reading carbon budgets, cumulative-emissions figures and TCRE numbers, which appear in both units.

Quick Answer

To convert gigatonnes of carbon to gigatonnes of CO₂, multiply by 3.664 (the ratio of their molecular masses, 44.009 ÷ 12.011). So 100 GtC = 366.4 Gt CO₂. To go the other way, divide Gt CO₂ by 3.664.

Formula

Gt CO₂ = GtC × 3.664. Reverse: GtC = Gt CO₂ ÷ 3.664. The factor is the molecular mass of CO₂ (44.009 g/mol) divided by that of carbon (12.011 g/mol) — because oxidising one carbon atom to CO₂ adds two oxygens, tripling-plus its mass. The same scale (Gt vs Gt) applies on both sides.

GtC× 3.664Gt CO₂
1 GtC× 3.6643.664 Gt CO₂
10 GtC× 3.66436.64 Gt CO₂
100 GtC× 3.664366.4 Gt CO₂
0.273 GtC× 3.6641 Gt CO₂
Gigatonnes carbon to gigatonnes CO2 converter — multiply by 3.664, the mass ratio 44.009 over 12.011; 100 GtC = 366.4 Gt CO2.
Gigatonnes of carbon to CO₂: multiply by 3.664 (44.009 ÷ 12.011). · MasterBrain v2026.284 · updated 6 Nov 2026

GtC and Gt CO₂ are not the same thing

The distinction is physical, not a rounding choice. When carbon burns it combines with oxygen from the air, so a fixed mass of carbon becomes a larger mass of carbon dioxide. Carbon weighs 12.011 g/mol; the two oxygen atoms it picks up weigh 2 × 15.999 = 31.998, giving CO₂ a mass of 44.009. That is where the 3.664 comes from — and it means nearly three-quarters of the mass of CO₂ is oxygen taken from the air, not the original carbon.

Mass composition of carbon dioxide Burning 1 tonne of carbon adds 2.664 tonnes of oxygen from the air, producing 3.664 tonnes of CO2. Carbon is about 27 percent of the CO2 mass; oxygen is about 73 percent. 1 tonne of carbon → 3.664 tonnes of CO₂ 1 t carbon + 2.664 t oxygen (from the air) Carbon 12.011 + 2 × oxygen 15.999 = CO₂ 44.009 g/mol → 44.009 ÷ 12.011 = 3.664
Why 1 tonne of carbon becomes 3.664 tonnes of CO₂: the added mass is oxygen from the air.
Why 3.664 and not 3.667?

You will see both. 3.664 uses the precise atomic weights — CO₂ 44.009 ÷ C 12.011 — and is the convention the IPCC uses for carbon budgets and the carbon cycle. 3.667 (44 ÷ 12) uses rounded whole-number masses and is the everyday stoichiometric ratio, used by the GHG Protocol and by our per-tonne carbon-to-CO₂ converter. The two differ by less than 0.1%, but for gigatonne-scale carbon-budget work this page uses the IPCC 3.664.

Key carbon-budget figures in both units

Carbon-cycle science and climate policy don’t agree on a unit: the carbon cycle and TCRE are usually in gigatonnes of carbon, while budgets and inventories are in gigatonnes of CO₂. This table gives the headline numbers in both, so you can read any source without tripping over the factor of 3.664.

FigureGt CO₂GtCSource
Remaining budget — 1.5 °C (50% chance)500136IPCC AR6, from 2020
Remaining budget — 1.5 °C (67% chance)400109IPCC AR6, from 2020
Remaining budget — 1.7 °C (67% chance)700191IPCC AR6, from 2020
Remaining budget — 2 °C (67% chance)1,150314IPCC AR6, from 2020
Cumulative CO₂ emissions, 1850–20192,390652IPCC AR6
Global CO₂ emissions, per year (recent)≈ 40≈ 11Global Carbon Project
Worked example

The IPCC’s remaining budget for a 50% chance of staying under 1.5 °C is 500 Gt CO₂ (from the start of 2020). In carbon terms that is 500 ÷ 3.664 ≈ 136 GtC. At roughly 11 GtC (≈ 40 Gt CO₂) emitted a year, that budget is about 12 years of current emissions — which is why the year the world “passes” 1.5 °C keeps moving closer.

Note on carbon budgets

Remaining budgets are measured from a fixed start date — the IPCC AR6 figures above are from the start of 2020 — and they shrink by roughly 40 Gt CO₂ (11 GtC) every year as emissions continue. Post-AR6 assessments put the 1.5 °C budget lower still. Always quote the budget’s baseline year alongside the number.

GtC to Gt CO₂ conversion table

The table reads both ways — carbon to CO₂ on the left (× 3.664), CO₂ back to carbon on the right (÷ 3.664).

GtC→ Gt CO₂ (× 3.664)Gt CO₂→ GtC (÷ 3.664)
13.66410.273
1036.6410027.3
50183.2400109.2
100366.41,000273
5001,8322,500682

Where these units are used

  • Carbon budgets. The remaining budget for 1.5 °C is usually quoted in Gt CO₂, but the underlying carbon-cycle science is often in GtC — so you convert to compare them (IPCC AR6).
  • Cumulative emissions. Total human CO₂ emitted since 1850 is on the order of 2,390 Gt CO₂ — about 652 GtC. Historical carbon-cycle datasets frequently report the carbon (GtC) figure.
  • TCRE. The transient climate response to cumulative emissions — warming per unit of carbon released — is defined per 1,000 GtC (best estimate ≈ 1.65 °C, IPCC AR6). That equals about 0.45 °C per 1,000 Gt CO₂, so reading it against a CO₂-denominated budget needs this conversion.
  • Related scaling. For a plain change of magnitude within one unit (megatonnes to gigatonnes, no carbon-to-CO₂ step), use the Mt to Gt converter; global annual emissions run around 40 Gt CO₂ (about 11 GtC).
Seen in the wild

The GtC/Gt CO₂ mix-up is one of the most common errors in climate reporting: a budget stated in GtC but read as Gt CO₂ (or vice-versa) is wrong by 3.664×. If a “carbon budget” of a few hundred looks like it might be carbon rather than CO₂, or an emissions total seems almost four times too big or too small, suspect a unit mismatch and convert before comparing.

The method behind this converter. The constants here — and why they are empirical rather than stoichiometric, why carbon is not CO2, and why an atmospheric burden is never multiplied by a GWP — are documented in the atmospheric CO2 unit conversion methodology.

Frequently Asked Questions

Multiply the gigatonnes of carbon by 3.664. For example, 100 GtC × 3.664 = 366.4 Gt CO₂. To reverse it, divide gigatonnes of CO₂ by 3.664. The factor is the ratio of the molecular masses of CO₂ and carbon.

About 3.664. When carbon is oxidised to CO₂ it gains two oxygen atoms, so one gigatonne of carbon becomes 3.664 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide — the added mass is the oxygen from the air.

3.664 uses precise atomic weights (CO₂ 44.009 ÷ C 12.011) and is the IPCC convention for carbon budgets. 3.667 uses rounded whole numbers (44 ÷ 12) and is the everyday stoichiometric ratio used by the GHG Protocol. They differ by under 0.1%; this carbon-budget converter uses 3.664, while the general per-tonne carbon-to-CO₂ converter uses 3.667.

GtC counts only the carbon; Gt CO₂ counts the whole carbon-dioxide molecule (carbon plus two oxygens), which weighs 3.664 times as much — nearly three-quarters of CO₂’s mass is oxygen from the air. A figure given without its unit is ambiguous by that factor, so always confirm whether a source means carbon or carbon dioxide.

The IPCC AR6 budget for a 50% chance of 1.5 °C is 500 Gt CO₂ from 2020, which is about 136 GtC (÷ 3.664); the 67% figure is 400 Gt CO₂ ≈ 109 GtC. Budgets are usually published in Gt CO₂, so divide by 3.664 for the carbon figure — and note they shrink by roughly 40 Gt CO₂ (11 GtC) a year.

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from 1850 to 2019 are about 2,390 Gt CO₂ (IPCC AR6), which is roughly 652 GtC. Global emissions currently add around 40 Gt CO₂ (about 11 GtC) each year.

Same chemistry, different framing. The carbon-to-CO₂ converter works per tonne and uses the 44/12 = 3.667 stoichiometric ratio for everyday accounting. This page is for gigatonne-scale carbon-budget work and uses the IPCC 3.664. Pick the one that matches your source’s unit and convention.

Scroll to Top