Scope: corporate disclosure, sustainable finance and due-diligence law · Jurisdictions: EU, UK, US and eight ISSB regimes · Status as of: 2 October 2026 · Last reviewed: October 2026 ·  Jeremiah Say Lead Systems Architect Builds the calculation engines and methodology documentation behind GreenCalculus.com. Read each regime’s status in its own instrument — the Official Journal, the FCA policy statement, the Federal Register and CARB’s regulatory record — rather than in commentary. LinkedIn GitHub Full profile →  ·  GreenCalculus Engineering Verification function Checks that a proposal is never written as law, that a regulation awaiting approval is described as such, and that every threshold and date on the page carries the instrument it came from. How we verify →

ESG Regulations — Narrower Than in 2025, and Still Built on One Inventory

ESG regulations as of 2 October 2026 are narrower than in 2025 and still built on one greenhouse gas inventory. In the EU, the CSRD now covers companies with more than 1,000 employees and over 450 million euros turnover, reporting from financial year 2027. In the UK, listed companies report against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis from 1 January 2027 under FCA Policy Statement PS26/19. In the US there is no federal rule in force: the SEC has proposed rescinding its 2024 rule, and California SB 253 requires scope 1 and 2 reports by 10 November 2026. Every regime starts from a GHG Protocol inventory of scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.
MB v2026.235 · updated 6 Oct 2026
Status date 2 October 2026
EU CSRD >1,000 staff, >€450m · FY2027
UK UK SRS · comply or explain · 2027
US No federal rule · California SB 253
Common core GHG Protocol scopes 1–3
GC stack layer Layer 6 — Disclosure regimes

“ESG regulation” is not one law. It is three kinds of law — corporate reporting, rules for investment products, and supply-chain due diligence — written separately in each jurisdiction. Which of them reach a company depends on where it is listed or does business and how large it is.

In 2026 nearly every one of them narrowed. The EU cut its reporting law to companies with more than 1,000 employees and over €450 million turnover, and its due-diligence law to more than 5,000 and €1.5 billion. The UK finalised its standards and then chose comply-or-explain over a mandate. The US Securities and Exchange Commission proposed withdrawing a climate rule that never took effect. Brazil made its ISSB requirement voluntary.

What did not narrow is the thing all of these rules ask for. Every one of them starts from a greenhouse gas inventory measured with the GHG Protocol, and most reach into suppliers through scope 3. Fewer companies must publish a report; the request for data still travels down the supply chain. This page sets out who must report, where and from when, as of 2 October 2026, and links to the full reference page for each rule.

ESG reporting requirements at a glance

If you only need to know what a rule asks of a company, start here. Each row is the requirement in force or adopted on 2 October 2026; the numbered sections below give the detail and the sources.

RuleWho must reportWhat, and assuranceWhen
EU CSRDMore than 1,000 employees and over €450m turnover; non-EU groups with over €450m EU turnover from 2028Scope 1, 2 and 3 (ESRS E1). Assurance: limitedFinancial year 2027, reported in 2028
UK listed companies (FCA)Commercial, transition-category and secondary-listed issuersUK SRS S2; scope 3 after one year. Say whether assurance was obtainedPeriods from 1 January 2027 Comply or explain
UK large companiesMore than 500 employees and over £500m turnoverClimate-related financial disclosures. No assurance requiredIn force since 2022
UK SECRTwo of: £54m turnover, £27m balance sheet, 250 employeesEnergy use and the emissions from it. No assurance requiredIn force; consultation planned
California SB 253US companies over $1bn revenue doing business in CaliforniaScope 1 and 2; scope 3 from 2027. Assurance: limited in the statute, but CARB accepts 2026 reports without it; reasonable from 203010 November 2026
California SB 261Over $500m revenueClimate-risk report every two yearsEnjoined
Australia AASB S2Groups 1–3 by revenue, assets and employeesScope 1 and 2; scope 3 from year two. Assurance: phased to reasonableGroup 3 from 1 July 2027
Japan SSBJTokyo Prime Market, ¥3tn+ market value firstISSB-based, scope 3 after relief. Assurance required from the year after reporting startsYears ending 31 March 2027
Singapore SGXAll listed companiesScope 1 and 2; scope 3 for STI companies from FY2026. Assurance: scope 1 and 2 from FY2029In force since FY2025
US federal (SEC)—None in forceRescission proposed

Provider directory

Now it has to hold up all year.

See who does this work. Every listing names the standards it works to, and paid placements are labelled. Including Pangolin Associates and KERAMIDA.

Browse 6 carbon accounting & inventory providers →

Do this work? A listing is US$390 a year. Get listed →

1. Three kinds of ESG law

 Corporate disclosureFinancial productsDue diligence
RequiresPublishing sustainability information, including emissions, with the annual reportDescribing how funds treat sustainability; classifying green activityFinding, preventing and fixing harm in operations and supply chains
ExamplesCSRD, UK SRS, California SB 253, AASB S2, SSBJSFDR, EU Taxonomy, FCA SDREU CSDDD
ReachesLarge or listed companies, by size, listing or revenueAsset managers, banks, insurers — and the companies that feed them dataOnly the very largest companies
Built onESRS in the EU; IFRS S1 and S2 almost everywhere elseThe regulation itself, plus company Taxonomy dataOECD and UN guidance on responsible business conduct

Two standard families sit under almost all corporate disclosure law. The EU uses the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Nearly everyone else uses the ISSB’s IFRS S1 and IFRS S2, adopted nationally under local names. A regulation decides who reports and when; a standard decides what the report contains. Confusing the two is behind most wrong answers to “does this apply to us?”.

2. 2026 in one view

Narrowed or withdrawn Fewer companies in scope EU CSRD and CSDDD · SEC climate rule · Brazil CVM 193 Directive (EU) 2026/470 cut both EU directives. The SEC proposed rescinding its 2024 rule on 29 May 2026. Brazil’s CVM Resolution 244 of 29 May 2026 made ISSB reporting voluntary.
Landing First reports due California SB 253 · UK SRS · Australia, Japan, Singapore California’s first scope 1 and 2 reports are due 10 November 2026. UK listed companies report from 2027 periods. Australia’s second group started on 1 July 2026; Japan’s largest companies report for years ending 31 March 2027.
The rules narrowed who has to publish. They did not narrow what a publisher needs from its suppliers. Scope 3 is still in every major regime, and it is measured in other companies’ data.

3. EU: the CSRD after Omnibus I

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive was amended by Directive (EU) 2026/470, the first “Omnibus” simplification package. It was adopted on 24 February 2026, published in the Official Journal on 26 February and entered into force on 18 March 2026.

WhoTest after Directive (EU) 2026/470From
EU companyMore than €450 million net turnover and more than 1,000 employees on average. No balance-sheet test.Financial years from 1 January 2027
EU parent of a groupThe same two thresholds, on a consolidated basisFinancial years from 1 January 2027
Non-EU groupMore than €450 million net turnover in the EU in each of the last two years, reported through an EU subsidiary or branch with more than €200 million turnoverFinancial years from 1 January 2028
Listed SMEsRemoved from scope—
  • Companies that already reported. “Wave one” companies, reporting since financial year 2024, fall out from 2027 if they are below the new thresholds. Member states may exempt them for 2025 and 2026 as well; whether they do is a national choice.
  • Assurance stays limited. The planned move to reasonable assurance was removed. The Commission must adopt limited-assurance standards by 1 July 2027.
  • No sector standards. The power to adopt sector-specific ESRS was deleted; the Commission may issue guidance instead.
  • A cap on supply-chain requests. A company with up to 1,000 employees may decline to provide more than the value chain cap, a list of the voluntary standard’s essential datapoints, when an in-scope customer asks, from financial year 2027. This “value-chain cap” is the first rule anywhere that limits how far a reporting duty is pushed onto suppliers.
  • Transposition. Member states must transpose the CSRD changes by 19 March 2027. There is no official Commission tracker of progress yet, so this page gives no count.
Directive (EU) 2026/470 — the scope test, verbatim

Large undertakings that “exceed a net turnover of EUR 450 000 000 and an average number of 1 000 employees during the financial year”.

4. EU: the ESRS, simplified

On 3 July 2026 the Commission adopted two delegated acts, both published in the Official Journal on 21 September 2026:

  • Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563 rewrites the ESRS. It enters into force on 10 November 2026 and applies to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027. For financial year 2026, companies may use the old ESRS, the revised ones, or the old ones with listed reliefs. The Commission cites EFRAG’s estimate that mandatory datapoints fall by 61%.
  • Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560 sets the standard for voluntary use by companies protected by the value-chain cap. It is what a smaller supplier answers to, and the cap itself applies from financial years beginning 1 January 2027. It builds on the EU’s earlier voluntary SME standard, the VSME.

What changed inside the climate standard is covered on our ESRS E1 page; how a company decides which topics to report is explained under double materiality.

5. EU: the Taxonomy

The EU Taxonomy classifies which economic activities count as environmentally sustainable. Companies within CSRD scope report the share of turnover, capital and operating expenditure that is Taxonomy-aligned. The Taxonomy Regulation itself was not amended by the Omnibus directive; it follows the CSRD, so the narrower CSRD scope carries straight through.

Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/73 simplified the reporting from 1 January 2026, with the old rules still allowed for financial year 2025. Its main relief is a materiality threshold: a company may skip assessing activities that together make up less than 10% of turnover, with matching tests for capital and operating expenditure. Two further draft acts on the technical screening criteria were consulted on in spring 2026 and are not yet adopted.

6. EU: SFDR now, and SFDR 2.0

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2019/2088, governs what asset managers, insurers and advisers disclose about sustainability. Its “Article 8” and “Article 9” product labels still apply.

20 Nov 2025 Proposed COM(2025) 841: sustainable, transition and ESG basics categories
Jun–Sep 2026 Council and Parliament Council mandate in June; Parliament committee vote 10 September
Now Not yet agreed Parliament first-reading position, then negotiation; current SFDR applies

Under the proposal, products in the sustainable and transition categories would need at least 70% of investments to meet the category’s criteria. The Commission proposed that it apply 18 months after entry into force; the Council’s mandate says 24. None of it applies until a final text is agreed and that period runs. Until then the current SFDR applies.

7. EU: the CSDDD

The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive was cut back by the same Omnibus directive.

 After Directive (EU) 2026/470
EU companiesMore than 5,000 employees and more than €1.5 billion net worldwide turnover
Non-EU companiesMore than €1.5 billion net turnover in the EU
Franchise routeEU royalties above €75 million and turnover above €275 million
DatesTransposed by 26 July 2028; applies from 26 July 2029; Article 16 reporting from financial years beginning 1 January 2030
Transition planDeleted Article 22 removed
PenaltiesCapped at 3% of net worldwide turnover
Civil liabilityThe EU-wide liability regime was removed; liability now follows national law

8. EU: the other instruments

InstrumentWhat it doesStatus
ESG Ratings Regulation (EU) 2024/3005Authorises and supervises ESG rating providersApplies from 2 July 2026
European Green Bond Standard (EU) 2023/2631A voluntary “EuGB” label for Taxonomy-aligned bondsApplies from 21 December 2024
Directive (EU) 2024/825 (EmpCo)Bans generic green claims and offset-based product claimsApplies from 27 September 2026
Green Claims DirectiveWould have required claims to be verified in advanceStalled Never adopted; not formally withdrawn

9. United Kingdom

The UK has its own versions of the ISSB standards, UK SRS S1 and S2, published by the government on 25 February 2026 and available for voluntary use by any entity. They differ from IFRS S1 and S2 in a few deliberate ways: no effective date, no fixed time limit on the reliefs for scope 3 and non-climate topics, the SASB references softened from “shall” to “may”, and an explain requirement for financial institutions that do not report financed emissions.

On 30 September 2026 the Financial Conduct Authority published Policy Statement PS26/19. It had consulted on making climate reporting mandatory for listed companies. It chose instead “a comply or explain approach across all categories of disclosures”.

 FCA PS26/19
In scopeListed commercial companies, transition-category issuers, non-equity and non-voting share issuers, and — added since the consultation — secondary-listed international companies and depositary-receipt issuers
Out of scopeClosed-ended investment funds, open-ended investment companies, shell companies
BasisComply or explain against UK SRS
FromAccounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027; first reports in 2028
ReliefsOne year for scope 3; two years for the wider UK SRS S1 disclosures
AssuranceNot required; companies say whether they obtained it, from whom and at what level
Transition plansNot required; companies say whether they have one and where
ReplacesThe TCFD-aligned listing rule

Three other UK duties are unchanged for now:

  • Climate-related financial disclosure regulations (2022) still apply to companies with more than 500 employees and turnover above £500 million. A post-implementation review is due by spring 2027.
  • SECR still applies to large companies (two of: £54 million turnover, £27 million balance sheet, 250 employees). Its 2026 review recommended keeping it with amendments, and the government plans a consultation on SECR and ESOS later in 2026.
  • Private companies have no UK SRS requirement. Whether to add one is part of the government’s Modernising Corporate Reporting consultation, open until 30 November 2026.

10. United States: the federal picture

The SEC’s climate disclosure rule was adopted but never applied, and is now being withdrawn.

2024 Adopted, then stayed Release 33-11275 adopted 6 March; stayed by the SEC 4 April; never codified
2025 Defence ended SEC stopped defending it 27 March; court case on hold from 12 September
29 May 2026 Rescission proposed Release 33-11421; comments closed 3 August; no final vote yet

Two fund-side items are often confused with it. The SEC’s 2022 proposal for ESG disclosures by funds and advisers was formally withdrawn in June 2025. The amended Names Rule, which requires funds with ESG-type names to invest at least 80% accordingly, has compliance dates of 11 June 2026 for fund groups with $1 billion or more in net assets and 11 December 2026 for smaller groups.

11. United States: California

California’s two laws apply to US companies that do business in the state, wherever they are headquartered. Our California reference covers them in depth.

 SB 253 — emissionsSB 261 — climate risk
WhoAnnual revenue above $1 billion; CARB measures it as the lower of the two previous fiscal yearsAnnual revenue above $500 million
WhatScope 1 and 2 every year; scope 3 on a schedule CARB sets, from 2027A climate-risk report every two years, to TCFD or IFRS S2
StatusIn effect First report due 10 November 2026Enjoined Ninth Circuit order of 18 November 2025
AssuranceStatute: limited from 2026, reasonable from 2030; scope 3 limited from 2030. CARB will accept 2026 reports without it—
Penalty cap$500,000 per reporting year$50,000 per reporting year
Two things to know about the 10 November date

First, it comes from CARB’s regulation, which CARB resubmitted to California’s Office of Administrative Law on 21 September 2026 and which had not been approved on 2 October. CARB continues to state the date. Second, for 2026 only, companies may report the emissions data they already held or were collecting on 5 December 2024 — or file a statement that they held none. Scope 3 is not required in 2026.

For scope 3 from 2027, CARB staff proposed in July 2026 requiring five categories — purchased goods and services, fuel- and energy-related activities, waste, business travel and commuting — with the other ten voluntary. That is a proposal for a later regulation, not adopted law. Under the statute, scope 3 statements made in good faith are protected from penalties, and between 2027 and 2030 scope 3 penalties apply only for failing to file at all.

On SB 261, the Ninth Circuit heard argument on 9 January 2026 and had not ruled by 2 October. CARB’s position:

CARB on SB 261 (verbatim)

“In light of the Court’s order, CARB will not enforce Health and Safety Code section 38533 against covered entities for failing to post and submit reports by the January 1, 2026, statutory deadline.”

No other state has enacted a corporate climate disclosure law. New York’s bill (S9072A) passed the state Senate on 10 February 2026 and has not passed the Assembly; Colorado’s was postponed indefinitely in 2025.

12. The ISSB baseline

Outside the EU and the US, corporate disclosure law converges on the ISSB standards. On 18 August 2026 the IFRS Foundation said that “more than 45 jurisdictions are using ISSB Standards” and that “by 2027, companies in 18 jurisdictions will be issuing reports”. It publishes a profile of each jurisdiction’s adoption; 23 were online on 24 September 2026.

The standards themselves moved too. Amendments to IFRS S2 issued in December 2025, effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, let financial institutions limit scope 3 category 15 to financed emissions and give relief where a jurisdiction requires different GWP values. A national regime built on IFRS S2 usually inherits both its reliefs and its scope 3 requirement.

13. Eight more regimes

JurisdictionRuleWho, and from whenBasis
AustraliaAASB S2Group 1 from 1 January 2025; Group 2 from 1 July 2026; Group 3 from 1 July 2027. Group 3 is two of: $50m revenue, $25m gross assets, 100 employees. Scope 3 from the second yearMandatory
JapanSSBJ standardsTokyo Prime Market only, by five-year average market value: ¥3 trillion+ for years ending March 2027; ¥1 trillion+ March 2028; ¥500 billion+ March 2029Mandatory
SingaporeSGX climate rulesAll listed: scope 1 and 2 from FY2025. Straits Times Index companies: full ISSB-based climate reporting from FY2025, scope 3 from FY2026. Other listed: FY2028 or FY2030 by size. Large private companies: FY2030Mandatory
Hong KongHKEX climate requirementsMain Board scope 1 and 2 mandatory; Hang Seng Composite LargeCap companies report in full from 1 January 2026. Full ISSB alignment for large publicly accountable entities targeted by 2028Mixed
Mainland ChinaSSE and SZSE guidelinesSSE 180, STAR 50, SZSE 100, ChiNext Index and dual-listed companies: first reports for 2025, published by 30 April 2026. The Ministry of Finance’s national standards are voluntary for nowMixed
IndiaSEBI BRSRTop 1,000 listed companies. Assurance or assessment of BRSR Core phases up to the top 1,000 in FY2026–27; value-chain disclosures voluntaryMandatory
CanadaCSDS 1 and 2Voluntary. Securities regulators paused a mandatory rule on 23 April 2025. Federally regulated banks and insurers report under OSFI B-15, with scope 3 from fiscal 2028Banks only
BrazilCVM Resolution 193Mandatory ISSB reporting repealed by CVM 244 (29 May 2026). Voluntary, but a company that opts in must continue for three years; non-reporters explain why from 2027Voluntary

14. The dates that matter, 2026 to 2030

DateWhat happens
10 Nov 2026California SB 253: first scope 1 and 2 reports (subject to OAL approval of CARB’s regulation). Revised ESRS enter into force
30 Nov 2026UK: Modernising Corporate Reporting consultation closes
1 Jan 2027EU: new CSRD scope, revised ESRS and value-chain cap apply. UK: SRS comply-or-explain periods begin. IFRS S2 amendments take effect
19 Mar 2027EU: CSRD transposition deadline
31 Mar 2027Japan: first year-end for the largest Prime Market companies
1 Jul 2027Australia: Group 3 starts. EU: limited-assurance standards due
1 Jan 2028EU: non-EU groups enter CSRD scope
26 Jul 2028EU: CSDDD transposition deadline
26 Jul 2029EU: CSDDD applies
2030California: reasonable assurance for scope 1 and 2, limited for scope 3. Singapore: large private companies begin

15. What every regime asks for

Underneath the differences, every corporate rule on this page asks for a greenhouse gas inventory measured in the GHG Protocol’s three scopes. Scope 1 and 2 are required wherever a rule applies. Scope 3 and assurance are where they part:

RuleScope 3Assurance
EU CSRD / ESRS E1Required where materialLimited
UK SRS (FCA)After one year, comply or explainDisclose whether obtained
California SB 253From 2027, schedule set by CARBLimited, then reasonable from 2030
Australia AASB S2From the second yearPhased up to reasonable
Japan SSBJAfter first-year reliefFrom the year after reporting starts
SingaporeSTI from FY2026; others voluntary for nowScope 1 and 2 limited, from FY2029

Scope 3 is measured in other companies’ data, which is why a rule that applies to a large customer reaches its suppliers years before any rule applies to them directly. The assurance level decides how good that data has to be: limited assurance tolerates estimates with stated methods; reasonable assurance expects evidence.

16. Common errors

ErrorThe position on 2 October 2026
“CSRD applies from 250 employees”That was the original test. Since Directive (EU) 2026/470 it is more than 1,000 employees and more than €450 million turnover, both required
“The SEC rule has been rescinded”Rescission is proposed, not final. The rule never took effect either way
“UK climate reporting is now mandatory”The FCA chose comply-or-explain. A listed company must report or explain why not
“The UK dropped climate reporting”It dropped the mandate, not the requirement to report or explain
“SB 253 does not apply to us; we are not Californian”It reaches any US company with over $1 billion revenue that does business in California
“SB 253 scope 3 has a safe harbour until 2030”Good-faith scope 3 statements are protected with no end date; separately, 2027–2030 penalties apply only to non-filing
“SFDR Article 8 and 9 are gone”They apply until SFDR 2.0 is agreed and its application period runs
“Brazil requires ISSB from 2026”CVM 244 made it voluntary in May 2026

17. What to do now

  • Map your obligations by entity, not by group. CSRD, SB 253 and the ISSB regimes each test a different legal entity against a different threshold. The obligation finder runs nine of them.
  • Build the scope 1 and 2 inventory first. It is required by every regime on this page and it is the part you control.
  • Screen scope 3 before anyone asks. A spend-based screen shows which categories matter; customers under CSRD, SB 253 or an ISSB regime will ask for those first.
  • Record every factor’s source and vintage. Assurance, limited or reasonable, starts by tracing a number back to where it came from.
  • Recheck the status dates. At least four of the rules on this page changed between May and September 2026, and SFDR 2.0, the SEC rescission, CARB’s regulation and the SB 261 appeal all await a decision.

18. How GreenCalculus implements this

GreenCalculus covers the measurement layer these regimes share: sourced emission factors, scope 1, 2 and 3 calculators with an audit trail, and per-regime pages for ESRS E1, IFRS S2, California, Australia, Japan and Singapore. The disclosure calculators work through each regime’s emissions requirements.

What we do not do: give legal advice or decide whether a particular company is in scope. Thresholds depend on consolidation, entity structure and national transposition choices that a page cannot see. Use this page and the obligation finder to narrow the question, and confirm the answer with counsel. We do not yet have reference pages for Hong Kong, mainland China, India or Brazil.

19. Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on where a company is listed or does business and how large it is. In the EU, the CSRD requires companies with more than 1,000 employees and over €450 million turnover to report scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions with limited assurance, from financial year 2027. UK listed companies report against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis from 2027. In the US, California’s SB 253 requires companies with over $1 billion revenue to report scope 1 and 2 emissions by 10 November 2026. ISSB-based rules apply in Australia, Japan and Singapore.

In the EU: the CSRD for corporate reporting, the EU Taxonomy, SFDR for investment products and the CSDDD for supply-chain due diligence. In the UK: UK SRS for listed companies on a comply-or-explain basis, the 2022 climate disclosure regulations and SECR. In the US: California’s SB 253 and SB 261, while the SEC’s federal rule is being withdrawn. Elsewhere: ISSB-based rules such as Australia’s AASB S2, Japan’s SSBJ standards and Singapore’s SGX rules. Status as of 2 October 2026.

EU companies, and EU parents of groups, with more than 1,000 employees on average and more than €450 million net turnover, for financial years from 1 January 2027. Non-EU groups with more than €450 million EU turnover follow from 2028. Listed SMEs were removed. The thresholds come from Directive (EU) 2026/470, which member states must transpose by 19 March 2027.

No. The SEC adopted a climate rule in March 2024, stayed it a month later, stopped defending it in court in March 2025 and proposed rescinding it on 29 May 2026. It never took effect. The live US obligation is California’s SB 253, which requires companies with over $1 billion revenue doing business in the state to report scope 1 and 2 emissions, with the first reports due 10 November 2026.

For listed companies it is comply-or-explain. The FCA’s Policy Statement PS26/19 of 30 September 2026 requires them to report against UK SRS for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, or explain why not, with one year’s relief for scope 3 and two years for the wider S1 disclosures. Large companies also remain under the 2022 climate disclosure regulations and SECR.

A regulation is the law that says who must report and by when, such as the CSRD or SB 253. A standard sets out what the report contains, such as the ESRS or IFRS S2. Several regulations can point at one standard: Australia, Japan, Singapore and the UK all build on IFRS S1 and S2. The emissions figures inside all of them come from the GHG Protocol.

Rarely directly; every major rule targets large or listed companies. But large reporters must cover scope 3, which includes their suppliers, so small businesses are asked for emissions data anyway. In the EU, a company with up to 1,000 employees can decline requests that go beyond the value chain cap, the essential datapoints of the voluntary standard listed in Annex II of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1560, from financial years beginning 1 January 2027.

Not yet. The Commission proposed a replacement in November 2025 with three product categories — sustainable, transition and ESG basics. The Council agreed its position in June 2026 and the European Parliament’s committee voted on 10 September 2026, but the two have not agreed a text. Until they do and the application period runs, the current SFDR, with its Article 8 and 9 disclosures, applies.

For breadth, the EU: no other jurisdiction combines corporate reporting, a classification system, fund disclosure and supply-chain due diligence. For emissions assurance, California and Australia go furthest, both moving to reasonable assurance. Japan and Australia make ISSB-based reporting a legal requirement, where the UK and Brazil leave it to comply-or-explain or choice.

Related References

Dark green Pinterest pin: the FCA chose a comply-or-explain approach for UK listed companies, alongside who must report under the EU CSRD, California SB 253 and the US SEC rule as of October 2026.
Save to Pinterest Download · 1000×1500 JPG
Scroll to Top